Anti-feminists say things like “but women CHOOSE to act sexy in movies-” but far too often, women are coerced/forced into doing it.
For example, in the Carrie 1976 movie, there’s a girl’s locker room scene that (completely unnecessarily) looks like soft porn, and Sissy Spacek (the lead actress) wrote in her autobiography that many of the actresses were literally crying because they didn’t want to do it, but they were forced to.So you use a single event that may or may not have happened the way you are describing it way back in 1976 which was 40 years ago as a talking point for 2016? I don’t understand how you think it’s even relevant now? Can you cite some more recent examples?
1 example from 40 years ago=all girls are,forced.
Also as anyone holding a gun to their head? Theybcouldve left. Both boys and girls in acting have to do things they wouldn’t normally do. Does that mean they’re coerced?
She did it,because she wanted the Monsey for doing it. She could’ve walked away and left. You can’t exploit something then complain that you were forced.
Women shouldn’t have to agree to be objectified in order to have a role in a movie. Especially when the objectification was unnecessary. The feminist director of the 2013 Carrie remake managed to film the locker room scene without objectifying the women. Absolutely nothing was lost from the scene except perhaps a decreased ability to get male viewers’ dicks wet.
My point is that often the idea for a sexualized scene comes from a MALE director (in this case Brian de Palma) & that they’re the ones responsible for only providing roles to women who are willing to be sexualized. Therefore “but women CHOOSE to act sexy in movies-” isn’t a valid argument.
Also the age of the film doesn’t matter because if anything it’s only gotten worse since then
Tag: this
I just want to help out all the people with no money but i am people with no money
I’m too Japanese for white people. I’m too white for Japanese people. Great.
I don’t care if they got a body like Nicki Minaj with their boobs pushed up to their chin and wear more pink and ruffles than a unicorn in a tutu. If they tell you they’re nonbinary, then they’re fucking nonbinary.
I don’t care if he’s got the highest, prettiest voice and wears dresses and pink glittery nail polish and high heels. If he tells you he’s a boy, then he’s a fucking boy.
I don’t care if she looks like the Hulk and talks like Morgan Freeman and has a beard to rival Thor and the hairiest chest and legs ever and wears a suit. If she tells you she’s a girl, then she’s a fucking girl.
Deal with it.
#GENDER EXPRESSION IS NOT THE SAME AS GENDER
I’ve been doing a lot of thinking and communicating with people from different cultures and I’ve come to a new conclusion about cultural appropriation. Now, I’m sure this isn’t new, but I’ve reached this conclusion for myself without any outside influences on my opinion, so don’t berate me for it.
There’s always going to be a difference in perspective when it comes to cultural appropriation within the cultures being appropriated. That difference is rooted in the difference between the diaspora experience vs the native experience. Those of us who live in countries outside of where our families come from(like Japanese people living in the US) will always have a different lived experience from those who have always lived in the origin country. So while those living in the origin country might not be offended and see it as appropriation, it is because they haven’t experienced the same racism and appropriation first hand as it presents itself when living abroad.
So in America, White girls who wear a bindi as a “fashion statement” are appropriating. However, when a friend of mine visited India, she was permitted to wear one(a traditional one, not the bejeweled ones they used to sell at claire’s) and traditional clothing. I still argue that the difference wherever you go is invitation, but many people living in their origin countries would disagree. Many are okay with it, and see it as sharing in stead of appropriation.
However, using my experience as an example, it is more acceptable to be a weaboo than it is to be a brown person who is mixed with Japanese. Weebs get free run of Japanese culture while they wave us off claiming they’re “appreciating” us. They’ll use broken Japanese in situations that don’t even call for Japanese to be spoken, shout “itadakemasu!” when eating Panda Express(holy shit that annoys me to no end), wear a kimono wrong/inappropriately, etc etc etc. And yet, I have been yelled at(albeit virtually) by a person in Japan for being annoyed about these things. I’ve been called slurs for not wanting to share my culture with weebs. And while I /do/ understand that in Japan exposing tourists to many elements of our culture is approved and even insisted upon, we are in America. And in America we face a racism that doesn’t have an equal in Japan. It’s because of these vastly different lived experiences that we have such differing opinions on what is/isn’t appropriation.
My grandma is the only person in my family /from/ Japan. When living here, weeaboos annoyed her. My sisters got into fights, literal fist fights, with weebs in school for disrespecting them(and insisting that they were honoring them). My aunt moved /to/ Japan so she wouldn’t have to deal with the things she dealt with here any more. I have been told by the same weebs that I’m not /actually/ part Japanese, that I’m only enthusiastic about Japanese culture and I should stop pretending. So like, it’s massive, massive differences between us.
So I think…invitation. If you are invited to explore a culture, go for it. However, in America, members of the diaspora or mixed race people will rarely invite you. Americans don’t know how /not/ to ruin stuff and like to think they know better than those who are teaching them, so it becomes something many of us shut ourselves off to. It’s absolutely infuriating and invalidating on both sides to think about, but it’s just a reality. The difference just boils down to experience, and both perspectives should be taken into consideration in these discussions, not just the one that seems to support appropriation.
This perfectly describes how I feel!!!
why is it that when a latina overfills their lips they are a “chola” but when white girls start to do it, its a trend?
how come a black person’s dreads automatically make them look like they smell like patchouli oil and weed and are branded dirty thugs, but when a white person does it, it’s boho chic, a style statement and representative of a love for nature?
why is it that so many little ethnic girls had to spend their childhood being called a monkey because of their thick eyebrows, but suddenly since white beauty made the switch from thin to thick brows, its what everybody wants now?
and when latinas draw on their eyebrows to make them look thinner, or when black girls relax their hair, or when asian girls pop in contacts and wear their eyeliner and false lashes, or when any WOC tries to change their look to conform to white beauty standards, they are still made fun of????
this book is worth more than a dozen restaurants that grow their own microgreens on the roof
😍
I know this isn’t a gardening blog, but I feel like this would come in handy for those of you who want to grow your own food!
– Mod AyaHOLY SHIT I NEED TO FIND THIS BOOK
how you gone colonize 3/4s of the world and be mad when i immigrate to whatever country
child…
Fam.
What drug is she on I wanna be the queen of everything
“Alaska language”
I want whatever she’s on.
“Americanish.”
Okay chile.
oh my gods
I can’t stop watching this. his face on the left is changing my life
As an introvert, the best thing is finding someone who it isn’t draining to spend time with
It’s interesting trying to explain to people who don’t experience social exhaustion that there are some people who are less draining than others and then their are those who are mind numbingly exhausting. All socializing is not equal